This small and simple book is very interesting, even to understand how a character so controversial, has been fascinated generations of people who have entered the sphere "damn" s' violent extremism of the 60s and 70s. The merit of this paper lies mainly in the fact that is seen with a critical eye of a right, certainly not radical, but more closely than others in the area of \u200b\u200breference. His criticisms are therefore free from any part of simplification. And that criticism! Demolenti rather fierce and not so much human Evola, as the myth evolved. " The introduction
then it is very beautiful because the author describes some of their childhood experience.
It reads very well and recommend it highly.
From the back cover: "More than thirty years after his death, Julius Evola is still a point of reference for the ideological world of the radical right. Resist his anti-modern philosopher of myth and legend of one of his Racism harmless because "Spiritual." Does it make sense to distinguish racism "spiritual" from biological racism? Provide racism / antisemitism reasons "spiritual" change the substance of the injury? Julius Evola's theories are really only "spiritual" or are just a failed attempt to sweeten the substance of racism / anti-Semitism? For Evola can not speak of a "curly" racist, but a radical and persistent racism that the conservative thinker at the service of Mussolini's turn, even at the cost of adapting the contents of the policy needs of fascism, never criticize the racial laws he not applied too moderate because of "discrimination." The evoliana "race of spirit "does not escape the biological determinism, and even turns into a totalitarian racism, more demanding, which differs from that of the" Manifesto of the race "just for the definition of the Italian race as" Aryan-Roman "rather than" Aryan-Nordic " "
From the review in The INDEX Francesco Germinario: " Right, the book has gone unnoticed, or has had some critical review. Et pour cause ... The author, an organic intellectual right-wing National Alliance proposes to relegate to the attic of the most celebrated author. In the opening pages, Smith confessed that he had suffered in his youth - the reference is to the first half of seventies - the influence of thought evolved, being tied to a more pragmatic and less ideological than the right. In any case, it is governed by Evola, so Fiuggi Rossi presents his culture: "The problem is that his apocalyptic catastrophe - that his meta torticollis - a right is compatible with modern and modernizing, politically reactionary and reformist, pragmatic and non-ideological. " Well said. There is a second reason that makes the essay interesting. To enact the abandonment of Evola, Rossi sinks the knife in the most delicate - not for historians, but for evolomani - the body of theoretical and political evolved, its racism, and right have made it increasingly peripheral. In short, Smith seems to suggest the right, Evola is not present because racist. Moreover, Smith considers just a "legend", as the subtitle, the racism of the spirit. This is aimed not at superameto biological setting, but rather to its "integration". This means that racism was not an exactly opposite to the Nazis, as his admirers have always claimed, but "more refined and effective, in which they are ill-hidden - behind smoke vocabulary - the suggestions of the concept of race in vogue at the time of Romanticism and Social Darwinism. " Here too, well said. We mentioned in the subtitle, but perhaps the best title to Evola - Just for its spiritualist pretensions - it was a racist totalitarian as is necessary to add any anti-Semitic position "
Scipione Rossi G., The racist totalitarian. Evola and the legend of anti spiritual Rubbettino 2008
0 comments:
Post a Comment